[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804]

To: danamcc at netscape_net
Subject: Re: [Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804]
From: Kelvin T Bailey <kelvinbailey at juno_com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 18:47:42 -0700
Cc: kelvinbailey at juno_com, chris.emery at ecoutlook_com, amy_smiley at hotmail_com, trance at radiks_net, over-the-rhine at actwin_com

On 28 Sep 99 12:57:13 CDT Dana McCullough <danamcc at netscape_net> writes:
>
>Sorry, but I have a problem with this logic--if you start accepting 
>some
>scientific principals as truth, then where do you stop??  I just can't 
>believe
>that someone can mix religion and science since they both refute each 
>other-

I'm not talking about religion or science.  I'm talking about truth.  You
guys are making a leap that I haven't made yet.

At any rate, I don't want this lively debate to cause any dissention
here.  I just enjoy and learn from the discourse.

Pax

Kelvin
________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail you don't need Web access to use --
Or get full, reliable Internet access from Juno Web!
Download your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagh.

Prev by Date: Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804
Next by Date: Krispy Kreme Doughnuts in Philadelphia
Prev by thread: Re: [Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804]
Next by thread: Re: [Re: RE: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804]/Doughnut Theories
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread