Re: the need for a rhythm section (was Re: Thoughts on OtR...)

[Kelvin T Bailey <kelvinbailey at juno_com>]

On Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:52:13 EDT JLuvzMusyk at aol_com writes:
>
>rhythm is more important than melody...for you can have rhythm without 
>
>melody, but can you have melody with rhythm? (no matter how obscure 
>that 
>rhythm may be).
>

Sure you can.  How about them thar Gregorian chants?  Beautiful melodies,
but no real rhythms to speak of .  Unless, of course, you're using a very
loose definition of rhythm.

Kelvin
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

---

• Prev by Date: Re: The new Bruce Cockburn CD
• Next by Date: Re: More thoughts on OtR...
• Prev by thread: the need for a rhythm section (was Re: Thoughts on OtR...)
• Next by thread: Re: [bjf]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread