Re: second person plural

["Coyote Lazarus" <coyote_laz at hotmail_com>]

>
> > --- David Armstrong <darmstrong at raygroup_com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > "...the English language needs a clearly
> > > identifiable second-person-plural pronoun,..."
> > >
> > > needs? come on now. surely you jest.
>
>to which Kelvin responded:
>
Jest? no. Spanish, if not most of the latin-esque languages have what is 
basicall a ya'll tense.

So, Strunk and White can bite me, but Ya'll is just fine for English for me

NP: you'd be really frightened to know, so just a hint:

"The balck hat is back in its original form"


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Do I Offend You? (was Re: +Live+ ect.)
• Next by Date: RE: Do I Offend You? (was Re: +Live+ ect.)
• Prev by thread: Re: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
• Next by thread: Re: second person plural
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread