Re: revisionism

[Gilhamilton at aol_com]

In a message dated 6/22/01 11:35:01 AM Central Daylight Time, 
petert at interchange_ubc.ca writes:

<< Ah, but what if someone were to produce a study showing that, say, only
 three million Jews had been killed, and not six.  What if the evidence, on
 closer inspection, pointed to a smaller number, but did not overturn the
 fact that something as hideous as the Holocaust actually happened.
 
 Would a person producing such a study escape cries of "revisionism!"? >>


Probably not. But I think the right thing to do would be to *revise* history 
to fit the new knowledge if that were the case. Truth is always the way ta go 
in my book.

kevin
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: now, which one is bad again? (history)
• Next by Date: Re: "Now, that makes me think...."
• Prev by thread: Re: revisionism
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: cs lewis
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread