[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: perfect schmerfect
Yes, the evilemail.com server sucks. I need to find a more reliable
offensive domain to post from. Of course, this one works when I'm not at
work (I'm not there now), but I need something reliable. Jeff K. -
maybe I could get an email at your bigbeefy.com?
> > Ok, it seems to me that a lot of you people are
> > missing the point of this exercise. "Perfect
> > Albums" is what we're going for here. Not albums
> > you really really like. Not really really good
> > albums.
>
> Think about what you're saying. If I say that an
> album is perfect, with no flaws, obviously it's an
> album I think highly of. The whole thing is
> subjetive. That's why I think it's loopy for someone
> to post a list and then for someone else to come along
> and pick the list apart. "you shouldn't list that
> album becaue blah blah blah..."
That's the whole point, bubba. That, and see ones other people listed that
I may have forgotten about.
And if it pisses you off, then that's just a bonus.
It's just silly when someone lists 4 different Smashing Pumpkins albums.
ok, so you're a Smashing Pumpkins fan, good for you. Doesn't mean that
every fucking thing they've released is "Perfect"
> Greatest hits, live
> > albums, and (most) soundtracks are disqualified by
> > default.
>
> How do you figure that? Pretty In Pink has
> continuity, a theme, and darned good music. As does
> the soundtrack from "Little Shop of Horrors."
I said "most" - a lot of soundtracks amount to little more than a greatest
hits of a certain era/genre/what have you.
~C
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/
Follow-Ups:
References: