[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: U2
> > Generally speaking, I don't care *what* a person's political views are
> > if they don't affect the art. And if they *do* affect the art, well,
> > it depends, then, on *how* it affects the art.
>
> i think i understand your point. but music is art and isn't the whole
> point of art a creative way of expressing one's subjective view of the
> tangible world? and so much of one's view of the world (like it or not)
> is at least somewhat connected to political views.
Sure. But, like Sting said, 'I'm Not Gonna Play Sun City' isn't exactly
all that creative.
> now, i'd agree there's a difference between weaving your thoughts on
> things into your art vs. blatantly propositioning them to the masses.
> but where do you draw the line between disagreement to the point of not
> wanting to patronize or is it possible to just block out that part of
> the message? what do you think?
Um, I'm not sure what the question is, here, actually.
--- Peter T. Chattaway --------------------------- peter at chattaway_com ---
"I detected one misprint, but to torture you I will not tell you where."
Winston Churchill to T.E. Lawrence, re Seven Pillars of Wisdom
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: U2
- From: E Geist <i_scoobysnak at yahoo_com>
References:
- Re: U2
- From: "jana blazek" <bluedegas at hotmail_com>