[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: good music bad music

To: Dan Temmesfeld <dantemm at erinet_com>
Subject: Re: Re: good music bad music
From: kelvinbailey at springmail_com
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 15:29:21 -0400
Cc: Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com, kelvinbailey at springmail_com, Ysobelle at aol_com




On Fri, 12 May 2000 15:00:39 -0400 Dan Temmesfeld <dantemm at erinet_com> wrote:

--why limit yourself to top 40 in looking for music--

Once again - I don't.  If I look at the current top 40 I may actually have only heard 10-15 songs, and most of that is probably from spending time with students.  I also enjoy a lot of stuff that ain't pretty, stuff that causes my wonderful co-worker to say "That's noise!  He's screaming at me!"  I think I was only saying what I think everyone else is saying (I think): There is a place for everything.  The only things that should be nuked is really stupid marketing and the music created for and by that marketing.  
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Good Music Bad Music
Next by Date: interesting side note
Prev by thread: Re: Re: good music bad music
Next by thread: Re: Good Music Bad Music
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread