Re: [Re: (G/g)od]

[Dana McCullough <danamcc at netscape_net>]

Kelvin T Bailey <kelvinbailey at juno_com> wrote:

<chris.emery at ecoutlook_com> writes:
>
>>Don't bring Over The Rhine into a perfectly good discussion of 
>>possible and/or potential god(s).


>Ya thinkin' Linford might nominate himself for that dubious honor?

Alright--I actually laughed out loud on that one--thanks!!  Was almost as
funny as Linford's Darth Vadar speech (maybe he should incorporate that into a
song. . .)

--dana--



____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804
• Next by Date: Re: [Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804]
• Prev by thread: RE: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #806
• Next by thread: Re: [Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V2 #804]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread