[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: annoyed?

To: Amy <aet at mail_dntcj.ro>
Subject: Re: annoyed?
From: cemery at iwaynet_net (Chris Emery)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 20:38:19 GMT
Cc: Kendrickjd at aol_com, OtR <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
In-Reply-To: <365A9A12.3B3AE289 at mail_dntcj.ro>
References: <984c9f3a.365a3964 at aol_com> <365A9A12.3B3AE289 at mail_dntcj.ro>

Amy <aet at mail_dntcj.ro> sez:
>I suppose you have a right to be annoyed. But if you are going to be a
>stickler about the rules posted I would say that the majority of postings
>would have to be cut. I would say that if someone has the *right* to post
>multiple topics such as gay dolls and sex, etc, etc, etc.. that one should
>have just as much right to post christian beliefs... in fact post any
>religious (whatever the religion) beliefs for all I care. If I don't want to
>read, I won't.
[...]

Amy has a point.

Therefore, when the Hand Of God moves me to post portions of the Koran, please
don't be angry with me.

Chris
"There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet"

-- 
NP: Tori Amos - Toronto 4/28/98
ICQ: 1388556  ***    AIM: ChrisEmery
Floyd Code: v1.2a r+d>s TW 0/0/ FD 1- 0 Meddle 3 0 29.8% <16oct98>

References:

Re: Over the Rhine & Friends

From: Kendrickjd at aol_com

annoyed?

From: Amy <aet at mail_dntcj.ro>

Prev by Date: Re: Productivity.
Next by Date: skies that fall
Prev by thread: annoyed?
Next by thread: Re: annoyed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread