[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Good Dog Bad Dog classic album ?or list gone wrong?



it has been so sad and rather depressing to watch people bite each others "heads off" on the list the last couple days.
its like people feel self righteousness or know-it-all or something, or perhaps, just like to be the devils advocate. buts its sort of as if individuals always try to prove a point that serves one purpose, not to further an important concept, but to prove that they can explain a tiny unimportant and intangible detail (with no real importance or effect on anything logical or necessary,) much better than another person can. are the majority of the listee's that bored?? once and awhile an important topic is discussed, of course, but then it is always broken down into mocking, discussing and ripping apart each others thoughts and perceptions. I just don't see the way to discuss when a common ground cannot be met. and as for the review, one persons perception is beautiful to an artist. If your daughter came to you and said mom, or dad, "your hair is like a silver forest" would you rip apart your child bc it offended you, and made you feel old, or aging, or didn't meet the stereotypical standards of what people should say? No it would be a precious, and cute and funny comment. Now that's a random example, but it goes to prove that people feel and see different things about the things they love, and there is beauty and truth in that. Lets not prejudice someone's interpretation, and then worse, prejudice, someone else for there's of that, and so forth. Manners please....
I've ranted enough....
patty
 
 
 
 ----- Original Message -----
From: GiNa
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:23 PM
To: over-the-rhine at actwin_com
Subject: Re: Good Dog Bad Dog classic album
 
From: John Paul Davis <johnd at antioch-college_edu>
>
> Gina,
> perhaps it's not a good idea to reply at 4 in the morning?

Ouch.  Now that was just mean.

> It's pretty clear from your response that you didn't read what I wrote
very
> carefully.

I did carefully read what you wrote and am more convinced now than ever that
I was on point in my response.

>So you think that St. Paul was saying that because we only know some
>stuff and none of us can know all truths exhaustively that we should
>quit trying to use the brains and mouths God gave us to wrestle out what
>that truth might be?

Of course not.  We should certainly use our minds, and dialogue is a vital
aspect of our personhood in general.  My comment went more to the spirit
behind "debate."

I apologize if I sounded like a pot calling the kettle black--it wasn't my
heart to offend you.  'Nough said, I think.

~Gina

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/


Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com