[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "undergarments"

To: over-the-rhine at actwin_com
Subject: RE: "undergarments"
From: Chris Lindemer <CD-Lindemer at wiu_edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 20:23:07 -0600
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E0F4895@BIGFOOT2>
References: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E0EDEA3@BIGFOOT2>

>On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, ms. tarquini wrote:
>
> > in that case my undergarment drawer would be....
>
>thou art exceedingly funny on this a slow day of work code and general
>sensibilities.
>
>rhys
>
>======================================================================
>
>there are some people who call their undergarments, "drawers".
>
>so wouldn't an "undergarment drawer" be redundant?
>
>it could also be misconstrued as someone repeating themselves.
>
>tranquilly,
>david

Nah, it's more fun to say "drawer drawers."  Not to mention more of a 
tongue twister.

As a side-note, I'm impressed at the number of UNIX-heads around here - I 
had no idea ;)  My drawer is probably something like drwxrwxrw-...not too 
sure about anyone else wearing (er...executing) my unmentionables. =P

-Smitty

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

References:

RE: "undergarments"

From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>

Prev by Date: Re: Buechner
Next by Date: Eve era Photo/Scan?
Prev by thread: RE: "undergarments"
Next by thread: Tribute CD update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread