[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "undergarments"

To: "'rhys daily'" <shadow at teuton_org>, "Over-The-Rhine-Chat (E-mail)" <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: RE: "undergarments"
From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:29:50 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E0EDEA3@BIGFOOT2>

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-over-the-rhine at actwin_com
[mailto:owner-over-the-rhine at actwin_com]On Behalf Of rhys daily
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:26 AM
To: Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com
Subject: Re: "undergarments"

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, ms. tarquini wrote:

> in that case my undergarment drawer would be....

thou art exceedingly funny on this a slow day of work code and general
sensibilities.

rhys

======================================================================

there are some people who call their undergarments, "drawers".

so wouldn't an "undergarment drawer" be redundant?

it could also be misconstrued as someone repeating themselves.

tranquilly,
david

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

Follow-Ups:

RE: "undergarments"

From: Chris Lindemer <CD-Lindemer at wiu_edu>

Prev by Date: Re: "undergarments"
Next by Date: filtering
Prev by thread: RE: "undergarments"
Next by thread: RE: "undergarments"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread