[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "undergarments"

To: "'Vogel, Andrew (VOGELAP)'" <VOGELAP at UCMAIL_UC.EDU>, "'ms. tarquini'" <lieselmarietarquini at yahoo_com>, "'Kelvin Bailey'" <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>, <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: RE: "undergarments"
From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:08:10 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E0EDE9F@BIGFOOT2>


damn straight!!! she could wear 125 or 126 pair for that matter!

tranquilly,
david

========================================================================

Well, let's NOT be too extreme. I expect that Ms. Liesel wore any more than
26 pair of boxer shorts at the same time that the effect wouldn't be as
compelling.

That's not a bad thing... Heck, the AVERAGE person can only look good
through 16-18 pair of boxer shorts.

Andrew Vogel

=========================================================================

i believe you've pointed out the obvious.

liesel is NOT average.

then again neither are you...so there!

tranquilly,
david

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

Prev by Date: RE: "undergarments"
Next by Date: Re: "undergarments"
Prev by thread: RE: "undergarments"
Next by thread: RE: "undergarments"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread