[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proofs and people

Subject: Re: proofs and people
From: "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 14:16:33 -0800 (PST)
cc: Over the Rhine List <Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com>
In-Reply-To: <20011231214304.72360.qmail at web11504_mail.yahoo.com>

On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Kelvin Bailey wrote:

> > Rather than define "stupid" as "Radiohead and anything which resembles
> > it too closely", or whatever, why not come up with a more objective
> > definition -- one that has no need of Radiohead for a reference point?
>
> Radiohead wasn't used as a reference point for a definition.  It was an
> example of word usage.

Well, I'd like to think we're talking about more than semantics here.

--- Peter T. Chattaway --------------------------- peter at chattaway_com ---
 "I detected one misprint, but to torture you I will not tell you where."
      Winston Churchill to T.E. Lawrence, re Seven Pillars of Wisdom

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

References:

Re: proofs and people

From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>

Prev by Date: Re: inerrancy vs. infallibility (no otr)
Next by Date: "word" games
Prev by thread: Re: proofs and people
Next by thread: Re: proofs and people
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread