[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proofs and people

To: Don Smith <dasmith at rotse2_physics.lsa.umich.edu>, Over the Rhine List <Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: proofs and people
From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 19:41:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200112310300.fBV306m01877 at rotse2_physics.lsa.umich.edu>

--- Don Smith <dasmith at rotse2_physics.lsa.umich.edu>
wrote:
> 
> No!  I was trying to say that by telling that
> particular story to that
> particular crowd, this is the impression evoked by
> that particular speaker.  I
> was not trying to make those claims about God's
> nature myself, nor was I trying
> to say that this impression was in any way accurate.
I'm sorry that
> I gave the wrong impression.

I understand.  I didn't think you were saying that. 
That's why I threw in that sentence about not
believing that you or Peter held to this line of
thinking.  You were just bringing up the example.

We all know that you, above all, are too smart for
that!

:)

Kelvin

=====
What if the hokey-pokey really IS what it's all about?!?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

References:

Re: proofs and people

From: Don Smith <dasmith at rotse2_physics.lsa.umich.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: proofs and people
Next by Date: a just cause for "when i go"
Prev by thread: Re: proofs and people
Next by thread: Re: proofs and people
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread