[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)

To: "'rhys daily'" <shadow at teuton_org>, "'Brad Caviness'" <bigwigenterprises at yahoo_com>
Subject: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:59:40 -0400
Cc: <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E9802@BIGFOOT2>

about henry - did it mean to imply that women bond more easily?

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

unless i missed something, ONLY monica "imprinted" herself into david.
hence the deep bond.

peace & veggies,
david 

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

Follow-Ups:

RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)

From: rhys daily <shadow at teuton_org>

Prev by Date: Re: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Next by Date: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Prev by thread: c-stone, lesbians, and off-listers...
Next by thread: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread