[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)

To: David Armstrong <darmstrong at raygroup_com>
Subject: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
From: rhys daily <shadow at teuton_org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:05:55 -0600 (MDT)
cc: "'Brad Caviness'" <bigwigenterprises at yahoo_com>, <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E02FC5A@BIGFOOT2>


> about henry - did it mean to imply that women bond more easily?
>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>
> unless i missed something, ONLY monica "imprinted" herself into david.
> hence the deep bond.
>
> peace & veggies, david

yea, but what i mean is - henry didn't seem to feel the need to bond with
david. and dual bonding was not addressed, i wondered how it could work
with a couple unless both bonded.

rs
-- 
Time passed . . . Dirk Gently' Holistic Detective Agency, Douglas Adams

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

References:

RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)

From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>

Prev by Date: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Next by Date: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Prev by thread: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Next by thread: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread