[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)

To: "'rhys daily'" <shadow at teuton_org>, <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:10:44 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E9805@BIGFOOT2>

about henry - did it mean to imply that women bond more easily?

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

unless i missed something, ONLY monica "imprinted" herself into david.
hence the deep bond.

peace & veggies, david

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

yea, but what i mean is - henry didn't seem to feel the need to bond with
david. and dual bonding was not addressed, i wondered how it could work
with a couple unless both bonded.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

his sympathy was for his wife & meeting her needs. i think he knew
if monica's needs were met, his would be as well. a happier home.

peace & veggies, david

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

Prev by Date: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Next by Date: Re: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Prev by thread: RE: "My God. It's full of stars" ( was: re: A.I.)
Next by thread: Re: A.I. Gripes (absolutely no OTR content)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread