[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cs lewis




--- Don Smith <dasmith at rotse2_physics.lsa.umich.edu>
wrote:
> Kelvin wrote:
> > "Creation Science" is a very ligitimate science.
> 
> Absolutely not.  No way, no how, and no where.

I'm sorry Don.  You're a very smart fellow.  But I
think you're wrong.  
 
> Science is
> evidence-driven.  If you find evidence that
> contradicts your
> hypothesis, you change or discard your hypothesis. 
> So-called
> "creation science" is hypothesis-driven.  If they
> find contradictory
> evidence, they ignore the evidence.  Actually, in
> practical terms, 
> they *don't* find contradictory evidence.  They are
> still presenting
> "evidence" that has been disproven for over thirty
> years.

I don't believe this is true at all.  There are
countless highly regarded scientists that would beg to
differ with you, and I'm not just talking about Chuck
Colson and Nancy Pearson.  I'm a pretty open minded
guy, and I've seen a truckload of good evidence that
points away from evolution.
I don't see how you can accuse creation science of
being "hypothesis-driven" and defend evolution as real
science when it is indeed the most religiously-biased
"science" I have ever seen.

> And before anyone accuses me of bias, I am a
> professional
> astrophysicist who is also a Christian.  I can't
> stand
> creation science. 

But that doesn't nullify it.
 
> Sorry, but this hit a nerve, 

Same here. :)

Actually, I'm not really looking to argue this,
anyway.  I may, however, at some point in the future
toss some questions your way privately when I get more
time to do more digging and learning.  You are a
pretty smart fellow.  Do ya mind?

Kelvin

=====
Time is precious
Talk is cheap
So make it mean something.
         -- Rob Jungklas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

Follow-Ups: References: