Re: a little bit. wait. bogarts. deathkeepsie.

["Dan Temmesfeld" <dtemm at yahoo_com>]

Laura Hepker [mailto:byrde at hotmail_com] wrote:
>>hmmm... loquacious perhaps (on paper at
>>least).  pernicious?  hmmm... i prefer to
>>be suspicious rather than pernicious.
>>i don't have the ill-will mindset to be
>>pernicious.  i can work on it, though.
>
> ahem. Perhaps I should have looked up the
> words first. Usually helps.

s'alright. :)
 
>>>sarah masen's got me covered...
> 
>>nope, no pun intended.  nor understood... :)
>>a little help?
>
> She *covered* the supertramp song, so she's
> got you covered, too... perhaps double meaning
> would've been better than *pun*, but...

ah... it all makes sense now. :)

thank you india,
Dan

np: ashley peacock - trespass 491


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

---

References:

• Re: a little bit. wait. bogarts. deathkeepsie.
• From: "Laura Hepker" <byrde at hotmail_com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: a little bit. wait. bogarts. deathkeepsie.
• Next by Date: RE: wooty-woot
• Prev by thread: Re: a little bit. wait. bogarts. deathkeepsie.
• Next by thread: good posts bad posts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread