[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.

To: Gabe Cooper <gabcoo at symix_com>
Subject: Re: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.
From: Amy Tompkins <aet at mail_dntcj.ro>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 23:48:21 +0200
CC: "'Amy Joy Eversole'" <amy_smiley at hotmail_com>, SANZENBACHER at novell_chem.utk.edu, hoopyfrood at juno_com, over-the-rhine at actwin_com
References: <735A4B22654FD311BCDE0090279C36BE134456 at phxmail_distribution.com>

Gabe Cooper wrote:

> Just an FYI.
>          NT mostly Greek(translated from some Aramaic, some Hebrew, some
> Greek) but some NT is in Hebrew(ie Matthew). It all depends on the audience.

hey speaking of. What about Hebrews? Was it written to Hebrews and in Evraic (oh
sorry, hebrew)?

Amy

References:

RE: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.

From: Gabe Cooper <gabcoo at symix_com>

Prev by Date: Re: I'm new but...
Next by Date: Re: I'm new but...
Prev by thread: RE: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.
Next by thread: Vol, Kelsey, Its goofy to be here
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread