[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.

To: "'Alfred B Johnson'" <hoopyfrood at juno_com>, <Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: RE: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.
From: "Kyle Howe" <howe.38 at osu_edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 12:02:28 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <19991103.094528.-244493.0.hoopyfrood at juno_com>



>But if you want to talk down an important bit of the faith of a whole lot
>of very intelligent people on this list,

hmm...I don't know... I've found sparks of sentience not to mention
intelligence few and far in between on this particular list.



kyle

References:

no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.

From: Alfred B Johnson <hoopyfrood at juno_com>

Prev by Date: Re: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.
Next by Date: RE: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.
Prev by thread: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.
Next by thread: Re: no it's not. yes it is. no it's not.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread