[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

This seemed mildly apropos. Or a comedic relief.



Unfortunately, I don't know who wrote it.



> >> > To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> >> >
> >> > what is your response?
> >> >
> >> > Chocolate is God's way of reminding men how inadequate they
> >> >  are. I am vividly confronted with this fact every time my
> >> >  wife and I go out to a restaurant. When it gets to dessert,
> >> >  my wife usually orders the most chocolate-saturated dessert
> >> >  possible: It's the one called "Unstoppable Double-Fudge
> >> >  Chocolate Mudslide Explosion" or some such thing. I always
> >> >  wonder why anyone would want to eat anything that promises a
> >> >  catastrophic natural disaster in your mouth.
> >> >
> >> >  The dark brown monstrosity arrives at the table, and my wife
> >> >  takes the first bite. Before the fork is even removed from
> >> >  her mouth, a small moan escapes her lips. Her eyes,
> >> >  previously perfectly aligned, first cross slightly and then
> >> >  faze completely, pupils dilating in pure chocolate pleasure
> >> >  before the eyelids clamp down in ecstasy. The hand not
> >> >  holding the fork clenches into a fist and starts pounding
> >> >  the table. The silverware rattles.
> >> >
> >> >  After about six minutes of this, she finally manages to
> >> >  swallow the bite, realign her eyes, and take the next
> >> >  shuttle back from whatever transcendental plane she's been
> >> >  visiting. Slowly, her sphere of consciousness expands to
> >> >  include me, her husband, her life-long mate, her presumed
> >> >  partner in all things ecstatic.
> >> >
> >> >  "Hey, this is pretty good," she'll say. "You want some?"
> >> >
> >> >  No, I don't. I want nothing to do with an object that does
> >> >  to my wife in one bite what I've worked for an entire
> >> >  relationship to achieve. It wouldn't do any good, anyway.
> >> >  Men just don't have the same relationship with chocolate
> >> >  that women do. It's not even close. I wandered around the
> >> >  office today and asked men -- "Chocolate. Your thoughts?" --
> >> >  and the result was always the same. First, a confused look
> >> >  as to why they're being asked about something so trivial,
> >> >  and then some lame, obvious statement: "Uh...it's brown?"
> >> >
> >> >  Ask women the same question, and you get responses like "The
> >> >  ONLY food group,"  "ESSENTIAL to life as we know it," and
> >> >  the ultimate casual swipe at every member of the
> >> >  Y-chromosome brigade, "better than sex." Ouch. Some women
> >> >  will try to make up for that last one by quickly adding that
> >> >  chocolate is supposed to be an aphrodisiac. Uh-huh.
> >> >  Chocolate certainly increases desire; problem is the desire
> >> >  is usually for more chocolate. The best a guy can do is buy
> >> >  a box of chocolates and hope he'll be considered somewhere
> >> >  between the cherry truffle and the strawberry nougat.
> >> >
> >> >  Don't get me wrong. Guys like chocolate just fine; it's just
> >> >  not essential to life as we know it. Respiration is
> >> >  essential to life as we know it; chocolate is simply one of
> >> >  those nice little bonuses you get. We won't usually pass it
> >> >  up if it's offered, but I don't know too many guys who would
> >> >  get substantially worked up if it were to suddenly disappear
> >> >  from the face of the earth (ironic in a way, as back in the
> >> >  days of the Aztecs, only men were allowed to have the
> >> >  stuff). When I eat a chocolate dessert, I enjoy it, yes. My
> >> >  worldview doesn't narrow to include only the plate that it's
> >> >  on.
> >> >
> >> >  Maybe we're missing something. On the other hand, we don't
> >> >  have to pick up our silverware from the floor after we're
> >> >  done with our cheesecake. Life is about trade-offs like
> >> >  that. All I know is that come Valentine's Day, chocolate
> >> >  will be among the things I offer my wife. I can't truly
> >> >  appreciate it, but I can truly appreciate what it does for
> >> >  her. Which is close enough.
> >> > what is your response?

Follow-Ups: