[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: babble in pews

To: cemery at columbus_rr.com, owner-over-the-rhine at actwin_com
Subject: Re: Re: babble in pews
From: Ysobelle at aol_com
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:17:05 EST
Cc: vogelap at email_uc.edu, debflinch at excite_com, Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com

In a message dated 3/25/99 1:14:27 PM, cemery at columbus_rr.com wrote:

>
>>Nonononono. It does NOT stand for that. I believe it was translated once as,
>>"No majority for the pity" (and yes, I know it doesn't make as much sense
that
>
>Are you posting without reading all the other followups first AGAIN?  I
posted
>the official definition from the band's website.

No, I'm posting common knowledge from the Goth scene. So there. Pthththt! And
we were always told it might have leanings towards no majority for the pity,
but mostly it meant absolutely nothing.

>
>>Ysoie, your font of useless G/I trivia.
>
>What started the 'Ysoie' thing anyway?  I never understood it.

It got started a LONG time ago and, surprisingly, had NOTHING to do with you. 

For once.

SMOOCH!

Prev by Date: Re: babble in pews
Next by Date: Re: Genre busting (was Re: Re: Re: babble in pews)
Prev by thread: Re: Genre busting (was Re: Re: Re: babble in pews)
Next by thread: Monk!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread