[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: This is dumb

To: Tndreamgal at aol_com
Subject: Re: This is dumb
From: Amy <aet at mail_dntcj.ro>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:24:21 +0200
CC: over-the-rhine at actwin_com
References: <7c83ac43.36f0503e at aol_com>

Tndreamgal at aol_com wrote:

> But I think we are attacking an idea that has some beauty in it.  Music doesnt
> just belong to us, but it also IS us, or a piece of us.

very true. what we do artwise holds a piece of us. I guess that's why we are
vunerable, and that's why it can hurt us but it can also liberate us...

> I dont agree that our work does not belong to us, but
> part of the point of this is that every piece of artwork reflects something
> common to man, something that we share.

well, here's the thing. If that's what was trying to be said it should have been
said that way. But to say that music (art) doesn't belong to us, when in fact it
IS us is absurd. more absurd that has been brought up so far. :-) How can
something that is you not belong to you???

> I think this might have been just a piece of what whoever the initial sender
> was trying to say.  No flaming, kids, no flaming.

and by the way, I am not flaming! LOL

Amy

References:

Re: This is dumb

From: Tndreamgal at aol_com

Prev by Date: Monk review
Next by Date: Re: TO SIGN?
Prev by thread: Re: This is dumb
Next by thread: Directions too
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread