[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
reply to jessyka
> I know that Jan is one who can deal with people spouting their beliefs...as
> she does so frequently. I think it was the whole idea of a forwarded
> message to the list that she was upset about.
> *hugz and kisses*
> Jessyka
LOL you know me well, don't you, jess?!?! i don't care what anyone's
beliefs are. i will be glad to discuss my beliefs any time, but not via the
list. i wish everyone would keep the liquid beef and sex doll posts
private, too, but especially the religious ones since that has had a
tendency to cause major fights in the past.
oh, and amy, if you're reading this, check out the archives during the time
where people freaked out about a story that our good buddy dug wrote. i was
the one advocating free speech! i still do, but i think we should try to
speak privately unless it somehow relates to the band... and again, the
occasional non-related (because we *do* have other interests) post is fine
(i sold an ani difranco ticket over the list), but i could see the recent
religious post
causing a snowball effect. it's happened before.
(sorry about all my parenthetical statemets!)
jan
>Kendrickjd at aol_com wrote:
>
>> oh my god. it is starting again...
>> don't people still get shelly's list of no-no's when they sign up for the
>> list?
>> annoyed--
>> jan
And then Amy said:
>I suppose you have a right to be annoyed. But if you are going to be a
>stickler about the rules posted I would say that the majority of postings
>would have to be cut. I would say that if someone has the *right* to post
>multiple topics such as gay dolls and sex, etc, etc, etc.. that one should
>have just as much right to post christian beliefs... in fact post any
>religious (whatever the religion) beliefs for all I care. If I don't want to
>read, I won't.
Follow-Ups: