RE: Rolling Stone

["Keith Bergendorff" <kbergend@hotmail.com>]

>From: Sweet & Tender Hooligan <glennp@twobythetree.com>
>Subject: RE: Rolling Stone
>Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:54:57 -0700
>
> >  It's true the publicity from a good review
> > would be nice for K&L, but I think it's sort
> > of a compliment to Ohio that it's
> > been overlooked by RS.
>
>The publicity would be better than nice. RS has a circulation of more than 
>a million; that's a lot of eyeballs and pocketbooks, and sleazy rag or not, 
>it'd be great for K&L. Truth to tell, there probably isn't a single major 
>media source that ain't sleazy or lame, but I'd like to see OTR on all of 
>'em.  :^)
>

Point taken, but in my view you can't have it both ways.  While I wish them 
success, what it takes to get that kind of mainstream attention is not what 
OtR's music is all about.

That doesn't mean I won't buy 10 copies if RS names Ohio album of the year, 
btw. :-)

Keith from NY

_________________________________________________________________
Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded 
its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage!         
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/