[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
rude? (RE: cclit)
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Peter T. Chattaway wrote:
> BTW, I hate to say this, but I have not been following this thread very
> closely and I have no idea what the subject header is supposed to mean
> but it seems just a wee bit rude in a south-park-ish sort of way ...
um - i don't get it - how is that rude?
it's cc lit - or cclit.
christian contemp literature, or somethin glike that.
i didn't follow this thread much either.
but i guessed the subj from the title of the emails comigns through
clueless
as ever
rhys
--
No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many
electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/
- References:
- RE: cclit
- From: "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>