[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the book was....

Subject: Re: the book was....
From: John Paul Davis <johnd at antioch-college_edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:54:55 -0500
Cc: over-the-rhine at actwin_com
References: <9BA6DCC15456CC46894E77233173DD7C014C9F45@UCMAIL5>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0



Vogel, Andrew (VOGELAP) wrote:

> 
> I have often read the books (as with The Lord of the Rings, Shakespeare, and
> others) before seeing the movie. Sometimes (as with Harry Potter), I haven't
> yet read the books before seeing the movie.
> 
> They're two separate things in my mind...


Word. Reading Shakespeare or LOTR is such a different experience, that 
it's difficult to connect them to movie adaptions.

-John

np: "Tupelo Honey" - Van Morrison

-- 
John Paul Davis
Center for Community Learning
Antioch College

++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ned Flanders: Let's just agree to disagree
Principal Skinner: I don't agree to that
Mrs. Krabapple: Me neither
++++++++++++++++++++++++++

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

References:
- RE: the book was....
  - From: "Vogel, Andrew (VOGELAP)" <VOGELAP at UCMAIL_UC.EDU>

Prev by Date: RE: the book was....
Next by Date: Re: Smeagle rocks (spoilers? Spoil-ED.)
Previous by thread: RE: the book was....
Next by thread: RE: the book was....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread