[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the violet burning and owen's ring (no otr)

To: Patty Teesdale <PatuniaT at msn_com>
Subject: Re: the violet burning and owen's ring (no otr)
From: Chris Lindemer <CD-Lindemer at wiu_edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 19:00:30 -0500
CC: over-the-rhine at actwin_com
References: <DAV55bm4M2S0gUFDKPG0002d557 at hotmail_com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020804

Patty Teesdale wrote:

>The violet burning has an amazing sound, but there sound and lyrics and  
>everything are destroyed by the fact that they sink to the level of using  
>a mixer. I loved their CD, but when I saw them at cornerstone, and realized
> they used a mixer, it ruined it for me. If they made an acoustic version I d
> buy it, but I just cannot stomach the whole mixer thing. It seems like cheating.
>  
>
Uh, a mixer is used by /everyone/ who uses some sort of amplification 
system, including our very own OtR.  I can't name a band off-hand that 
played without such equipment at /any/ show I've been to.

Maybe your definition of a mixer and the classical definition are rather 
different; perhaps you meant a sequencer?

-Smitty the Gearhead

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

References:

Re: the violet burning and owen's ring (no otr)

From: "Patty Teesdale" <PatuniaT at msn_com>

Prev by Date: oTr Product Tie-ins
Next by Date: Re: oTr Product Tie-ins
Prev by thread: Re: the violet burning and owen's ring (no otr)
Next by thread: Re: the violet burning and owen's ring (no otr)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread