[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bowie, nin, higher powers, etc

To: Christian D Lindemer <CD-Lindemer at wiu_edu>
Subject: Re: bowie, nin, higher powers, etc
From: rhys daily <shadow at teuton_org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:26:20 -0700 (MST)
cc: <JaunasAddiccion at aol_com>, <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.1020125131652.27734B-100000@ecom1>

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Christian D Lindemer wrote:

> This has been questioned by multiple people, so I might as well
> qualify. I wasn't talking abotu censoring God the entity, I was
> talking about the word.  Like censoring "f--k" et al.  It still gets
> the point across, but is somehow less offensive.  Why, I don' know.

smitty et all.

maybe there is a difference between the implicative - which leave sther
eader to infer and the direct?

and perhaps that is why ---- is less offsnive

guessing randomly

rhys

-
are you a turtle?

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

References:

Re: bowie, nin, higher powers, etc

From: Christian D Lindemer <CD-Lindemer at wiu_edu>

Prev by Date: RE: bowie, nin, higher powers, etc
Next by Date: Re: broccoli is heaven...
Prev by thread: Re: bowie, nin, higher powers, etc
Next by thread: RE: bowie, nin, higher powers, etc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread