[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: can't we just do 2001 again

To: "'Kelvin Bailey'" <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>, <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:14:07 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E0EDCD9@BIGFOOT2>



--- David Armstrong <darmstrong at raygroup_com> wrote:
> 
> 
> "...the English language needs a clearly 
> identifiable second-person-plural pronoun,..."
> 
> needs? come on now. surely you jest.


That's why God made "You Guys".

k

====================================================

and....."you people".

tranquilly,
david

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

Follow-Ups:

RE: can't we just do 2001 again

From: "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>

Prev by Date: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
Next by Date: second person plural
Prev by thread: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
Next by thread: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread