[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: can't we just do 2001 again

To: over-the-rhine at actwin_com
Subject: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:10:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <FA129CE38863D511AC610002A574B28E0F483F@BIGFOOT2>


--- David Armstrong <darmstrong at raygroup_com> wrote:
> 
> 
> "...the English language needs a clearly 
> identifiable second-person-plural pronoun,..."
> 
> needs? come on now. surely you jest.


That's why God made "You Guys".

k

=====
What if the hokey-pokey really IS what it's all about?!?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

Follow-Ups:

second person plural

From: Bethany Keeley <blk4 at calvin_edu>

RE: can't we just do 2001 again

From: "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>

References:

RE: can't we just do 2001 again

From: "David Armstrong" <darmstrong at raygroup_com>

Prev by Date: Windows XP (no OTR)
Next by Date: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
Prev by thread: RE: can't we just do 2001 again
Next by thread: second person plural
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread