[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re The BORG view of sexuality

To: "Liesel tarquini" <lieselmarietarquini at yahoo_com>, "bigLight" <biglight at pacbell_net>
Subject: Re: Re The BORG view of sexuality
From: "Black Draver" <marquee at knology_net>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:40:10 -0400
Cc: <Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com>
References: <20011023154900.78575.qmail at web13805_mail.yahoo.com>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Liesel
> which begs the question, could it, will it live up to
> the first?

um, in a word, probably not :) but with sequels, you pays your money, you
takes your chances.

> >groggy and soggy
>
> no pun intended?!

how punny of me (us).;

M


---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

Follow-Ups:

Re: Re The BORG view of sexuality

From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>

References:

Re: Re The BORG view of sexuality

From: Liesel tarquini <lieselmarietarquini at yahoo_com>

Prev by Date: Re: soylent green (and otr content)
Next by Date: king's x (no otr)
Prev by thread: Re: Re The BORG view of sexuality
Next by thread: Re: Re The BORG view of sexuality
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread