[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cs lewis
--- "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>
wrote:
Creation Science
> exists to offer
> > scientific proof, from the pysical world, that
> creation is valid.
>
> In other words, it puts the conclusion *ahead* of
> the evidence and, in
> that sense, is *not* a legitimate science.
Guess I could have phrased that better, huh?
>
> There's nothing wrong with looking for evidence to
> see whether or not it
> supports a hypothesis. But if you start with an
> unfalsifiable hypothesis,
> which is more or less what "creation scientists" do,
> it ain't science.
And evolutionists never do this...?
=====
Time is precious
Talk is cheap
So make it mean something.
-- Rob Jungklas
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: cs lewis
- From: "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>
References:
- Re: cs lewis
- From: "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>