[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cs lewis

To: "Kelvin Bailey" <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>, "Don Smith" <dasmith at rotse2_physics.lsa.umich.edu>, "Over the Rhine List" <Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: cs lewis
From: "Chris Emery" <cemery at columbus_rr.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:09:59 -0400
References: <20010622150236.52416.qmail at web11504_mail.yahoo.com>

> > > I'm sorry Don.  You're a very smart fellow.  But I
> > > think you're wrong.
> > 
> > Stop.  Don does this better than you.
> 
> He doesn't "do it" better than me.  He's just more
> knowledgeable in the area of science than I am.  But
> that's okay, I'm not easily intimidated.  Besides, if
> I only bumped noggins with people who were dummer than
> me, I wouldn't learn much, would I?

Too late for that, peut-etre.

> So, no; I'll stop when I want to.

No, I think stopping would be a *fabulous* idea.

> Thanks for your concern.

Who's concerned?

~C

PS - anybody know the truth about Dug?  Confirm/Deny?

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

Follow-Ups:

Re: cs lewis

From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>

References:

Re: cs lewis

From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>

Prev by Date: Re: cs lewis
Next by Date: now, which one is bad again? (history)
Prev by thread: Re: cs lewis
Next by thread: Re: cs lewis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread