[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
true...
- To: petert at interchange_ubc.ca, cemery at columbus_rr.com
- Subject: true...
- From: XC0VENANTX at aol_com
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:02:57 EST
- CC: Ysobelle at aol_com, andrew.west at l-3com_com, red_unicorn at geocities_com, pngwn at hotmail_com, bbohn at cdnow_com, binkmeisterrick at yahoo_com, carrie at dscience_com, fheilman at bellatlantic_net, RyoKoChick at aol_com, helcat at sff_net, phillygoth at tyranny_com, kayellen6 at hotmail_com, pyrateking at hotmail_com, xxjennyfurxx at yahoo_com, jonathanabinader at hotmail_com, indigoebony at yahoo_com, LstatShaft at aol_com, Lars at lundegaard_com, noriko_lovasz at vanguard_com, over-the-rhine at actwin_com, DrklyWckd at aol_com, Dandu at greenapple_com, ssegal at voicenet_com, tangentland at egroups_com, tim at morganadesign_com, ads at p3_net, emerge at egroups_com, pgh-goth-list at nine_org, ravenslight at success_net
and let me remind us all that as far as pat is concerned- in the last
election, he received 8,000 votes in palm beach county. who's to say that he
couldn't recieve 3,000 this time around as his following has increased
dramatically? it's all hogwash- the media is liberal, thus they want a
liberal agenda for our country to follow. has anyone else noticed the belly
aching on behalf of the democrats about nader (whom only received 3% of the
vote)? do they not recall perot's run where he managed to take a whopping
19% of the people's vote (which most would have gone to bush?)
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
megsy*
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/