[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the kyle debate and kelvin's other thing
Good point, but I'm kind of talkig about a different sort of thing. I definitely agree that the differences of opinions and general disagreements should not only be welcome, but actually belong here. You're right, that's kind of the point of the list - or at least as I see it. What I was talking about are the instances when folks feel the need to attack someone personally, not what they are saying. Maybe that's the distiction that could be made: If you have a reply to something that is said - the actual content - post it publically. If you want to attack the poster (which I really wish they wouldn't), do it privately. That sort of thing benefits no one.
Hope I was clearer...
Kelvin
On Tue, 2 May 2000 11:05:55 EDT JLuvzMusyk at aol_com wrote:
--as for kelvin's idea of posting privately when someone makes you mad...that's
a good idea and a bad idea. if we say that, we have to draw the line. say,
i say something about how i don't like _gdbd_ (which i don't, really), and
that makes you mad...will you e-mail me privately? that would take all the
fun out of the list. without the debating of minds and the conflict of
opinions, what would we have to talk about?--
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/