[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Re: Moth]

To: dana brewer <daturawest at netscape_net>
Subject: Re: [Re: Moth]
From: Dusty Volume <marquis at icx_net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:45:36 -0500
CC: Chris Emery <chris.emery at ecoutlook_com>, Kelvin Bailey <kelvinbailey at juno_com>, Bruce Lachey <b_lachey at hotmail_com>, over-the-rhine at actwin_com
References: <20000228224000.10955.qmail at www0p_netaddress.usa.net>

> Think about it, it COULD be a bad thing -- just depends.  If there are panties
> in a bunch of seaweed, that couldn't possibly be good.


What if they were in a bunch of seaweed on the plate of the mad, mad
panty eater of east Brunswick (who also likes kelp) and they're sitting
there right when the police barge in and discover all the stolen panties
from all those panty raids he's (or she's) been involved in.  This would
be good.  This would be very good.

Mark, 

who also will never be elected to public office now.  Oh wait, no one
knows my last name!  Nevermind...
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

References:

Re: [Re: Moth]

From: dana brewer <daturawest at netscape_net>

Prev by Date: Re: [Re: Moth]
Next by Date: Francis Schaefer (was Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V3 #51)
Prev by thread: Re: [Re: Moth]
Next by thread: Francis Schaefer (was Re: Over-The-Rhine Digest V3 #51)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread