[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mate or Lover?

To: Ponybat at aol_com
Subject: Re: Mate or Lover?
From: Amy Tompkins <aet at mail_dntcj.ro>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:18:56 +0200
CC: jnedsfox at moody_edu, Over-the-rhine at actwin_com
References: <69230425.36a4e88d at aol_com>

Ponybat at aol_com wrote:

> Hmmm . . . I usually stay out of things on this list - especially the "Eve vs.
> GDBD" argument, but I must say that the simplistic beauty of GDBD will never
> get old to me.  I have to be in a certain mood to really enjoy Eve (2nd
> favorite), but there's something about the understated, quiet emotion of GDBD
> that never leaves me feeling let-down.

you feel let down when you listen to the others???

> It's pure music and pure poetry without the frills

the others don't have pure music and pure poetry without the frills? If so, may I
ask what you mean by frills? I have always found a simplistic intenseness in all
of the albums... and all to me are pure music and pure poetry, more of the
latter...

Amy

References:

Re: Mate or Lover?

From: Ponybat at aol_com

Prev by Date: Re: Mate or Lover?
Next by Date: Re: a bed of nails or a maple floor?
Prev by thread: Re: Mate or Lover?
Next by thread: Re: Mate or Lover?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread