[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Oh, good, Chris Emery is back....
On Mon, 4 Jan 1999 SheepyFuzz at aol_com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/4/99 10:07:16 AM EST, cemery at columbus_rr.com writes:
>
> > Dancing on a volcano, Rick Callender <binkmeisterrick at yahoo_com> said:
> >
> > >SheepyFuzz at aol_com wrote:
> > >>
> > >> back, and in fine form.
> > >
> > >well, if you're in "fine form" that should automatically add you to
> > >the Attractive Listie Theory.
> >
> > Fine form verbally has nothing to do with my attractiveness. Like I
> > said before, I'm excluding myself from the study so as not to skew the
> > results.
>
hey, now, I must address the fine verbal form in relation to
attractiveness...I've made a minor study of it in my own life. I find
myself every semester become deeply attracted to some male in my english
classes. Inevitably, these guys (which on first examination are NOT
physically attractive) say things that just "touch me". So, it's not the
physical appearance, but rather the words they say that cause me to spend
a great deal of time and poetry dwelling on them.
In short, what a man says and how attractive he is is VERY related.
KT
Follow-Ups:
References: