RE: Answer.(this isn't a flame)

["Chris Queen" <cqueen at tmsmail_net>]

Matt wrote:
> Chris, you wouldn't talk like that if it were Judy Garland, now
> would you?
> You know?

Actually I'm not familiar enough with Judy Garland; unfortunately my
knowledge of her begins and ends with "The Wizard Of Oz."

> I guess what I'm getting at is, well, I 've been wonderin' for
> some time now, is "Queen" your REAL name?

Oh, trust me, I've dealt with that taunt for nearly three decades.  :-)

> Okay, I'll spell it
> out- are you
> gay?
>

No, I'm not, but thanks for asking anyway.  :-)

> Just kiddin', bro. ;-)  (I feel kinda silly today.)

No offense taken.  It's Friday, and we're all entitled to a bit of silliness
to cut through the tension today.

Not flaming,
Chris

PS--Why hasn't anyone come to *my* defense?  Huh?  Huh?

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

---

References:

• RE: Answer.(this isn't a flame)
• From: "The Mattrix" <soberman_69 at hotmail_com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re:Re: a great job (Re:Re: Greetings from a newstie)
• Next by Date: RE: happy birthday, yogurt face?
• Prev by thread: RE: Answer.(this isn't a flame)
• Next by thread: Re: Answer.(this isn't a flame)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread