[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the what of the who?

To: Dan Temmesfeld <dantemm at erinet_com>
Subject: Re: the what of the who?
From: chris.emery at ecoutlook_com (Chris Emery)
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 19:16:48 GMT
Cc: Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.2.32.19991106130030.00793c20 at mail_erinet.com>
References: <3.0.2.32.19991106130030.00793c20 at mail_erinet.com>

Dancing on a volcano, Dan Temmesfeld <dantemm at erinet_com> said:

>Marc Brooks wrote:
>>> I never could get a hang of Thursdays.
>> 
>>Erm, that would be one Prefect, Ford
>
>Chickens are better, but they don't resonate as well using milk.
>
>[Sorry, that's just my way of saying- I have no idea what you said...]

That's all right.   Marc is wrong anyway, since it was Arthur who
couldn't get the hang of Thursdays.

-- 
NP: Peter Gabriel _Peter Gabriel_

chris.emery at ecoutlook_com
ICQ: 1355886

References:

Re: the what of the who?

From: Dan Temmesfeld <dantemm at erinet_com>

Prev by Date: Re: the what of the who?
Next by Date: Re: The truth about the "A" list. This post will self destruct inn 10, 9, 8 . . .
Prev by thread: Re: the what of the who?
Next by thread: test, test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread