[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: annoyed?

To: Amy <aet at mail_dntcj.ro>
Subject: Re: annoyed?
From: cemery at iwaynet_net (Chris Emery)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:00:54 GMT
Cc: SheepyFuzz at aol_com, OtR <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
In-Reply-To: <365C1C99.39E6E534 at mail_dntcj.ro>
References: <9230c387.365b82a1 at aol_com> <365C1C99.39E6E534 at mail_dntcj.ro>

Amy <aet at mail_dntcj.ro> sez:
>SheepyFuzz at aol_com wrote:
>
>> it wasn't the content of the post so much as the context.  a long, scrolly,
>> forward type thing.
>
>I agree that it was annoying... BUT you have to admit that you know right away if
>it is something like that and you can do what I do most of the time... delete it..
>no need to comment when you know people will do it again and again...

You definitely need to comment.   There's no place for forwards, scrolly
things, urban legends, or virus hoax warnings on a discussion list.

And think of the poor bastards on the digest who had to scroll down there to
get to the next article.

-- 
NP: Pink Floyd - _Dark Side Of The Moon_
ICQ: 1388556  ***    AIM: ChrisEmery
Floyd Code: v1.2a r+d>s TW 0/0/ FD 1- 0 Meddle 3 0 29.8% <16oct98>

References:

Re: annoyed?

From: SheepyFuzz at aol_com

Re: annoyed?

From: Amy <aet at mail_dntcj.ro>

Prev by Date: Re: skies that fall
Next by Date: delusions of grand marnier
Prev by thread: Re: annoyed?
Next by thread: Re: the next c.d...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread