[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @ Sixpence/Terroristen no otr
In a message dated 10/26/98 11:45:50 PM EST, petersen at info2000_net writes:
> SheepyFuzz at aol_com wrote:
>
> > layne perterson wrote (of my little sixpencies) (or is it Six Pencies for
the
> > especially stupid?)
>
> What are you trying to say here, Sha? You callin' me stupid? ;)>
no, i'm calling you especially stupid. : )*
> > > Pretty good song. The rest of the CD is just as good. All three (or
four,
>
> > > if you count their ep) are really good.
> >
> > or five if you count _the original demos_.
> > which i do.
>
> True. I would too if I could ever, you know, locate it.
i bought a copy off someone on rmc about a year back. i'm always looking for
more copies, 'cause everyone seems to want one. (i'm also searching for actual
sixpence pieces; i have a jewelry idea. i had a lucky sixpence, but i gave it
to Someone Very Special and perhaps it wasn't so lucky after all.)
> > love,
> > sha
> > (looking forward to seeing sixpence the fourth of novermbre, at a club
that
> > hosted vanilla ice just a week or two ago.)
>
> You've seen them before, right?
more times than any child should be allowed, but i'm not complaining.
> > oh, and by the way...is it kosher for me to just send mail to the list,
and
> > not copies to various other parties? i don't mind getting two copies of
stuff
> > in my mailbox (it makes me feel popular?) but i would think that others
would.
>
> I generally send to the list and to the sender. But to whomever that
doesn't work
> for, I'm certainly willing to only send to the list...
i don't mind it, just seems peculiar.
love,
sha