Re: my boy problems (almost no otr)

[Mark Utley <mau222 at isoc_net>]

> Peter T. Chattaway wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Mark Utley wrote:
> > Certainly one can point to many abuses and human weakness in the history
> > of the Catholic Church (most of which have been resolved or reformed,
> > some of which I think are historical inaccuracies accepted as fact), but
> > my point is, if one is looking for a "hermeneutical screen" through
> > which to interpret scripture, what better one than the one that can
> > trace its history directly back to the time of Christ?
>
> By that standard, we'd be Orthodox, not Catholic.  ;)
>
Why do you say that?  Peter went to Rome, not Constantinople.

Peace,
Mark

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/OtR/

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: my boy problems (almost no otr)
• From: "Peter T. Chattaway" <petert at interchange_ubc.ca>

---

• Prev by Date: Re:
• Next by Date: Re: my boy problems (almost no otr)
• Prev by thread: Re: my boy problems (almost no otr)
• Next by thread: Re: my boy problems (almost no otr)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread