[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Miami Herald
--- bigLight <biglight at pacbell_net> wrote:
>
Oprah replied
> "That's a
> *spiritual* concept, not a financial one." In doing
> so she was
> advocating a spirituality that is meaningless,
> because she was
> suggesting spiritual things don't affect the rest of
> life. By making
> Jesus's teacing about turning the other cheek mean
> only small offenses
> against individuals, you're doing somewhat the same
> thing.
Please don't ever equate me with Oprah and her
namby-pamby "spirituality".
I really don't have the heart to discuss this any
further, but I do want to encourage you to watch what
you're doing here. I'm giving you the benefit of the
doubt and assuming you didn't mean to, but you just
said that I am advocating a spirituality that is
meaningless. Not only is this offensive to me, I
would claim the total opposite.
Once again, I'm assuming the best intentions on your
part, but you need to be careful. Thanks.
See, don't we play nice?
Kelvin
=====
Willy Wonka: "You know what happened to the man who suddenly got everything he ever wanted?"
Charly: "No. What?"
Willy Wonka: "He lived happily ever after."
__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/
Follow-Ups:
References: