[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: moulin rouge

To: "eustace clarence" <ecscrubb at swbell_net>, "jay and jenna eads" <eadsj at qwest_net>, "Melanie Shannon" <arwen725 at hotmail_com>, <sswans83 at calvin_edu>, <over-the-rhine at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: moulin rouge
From: "Chris Emery" <cemery at columbus_rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:50:11 -0400
References: <F218BFvQtqqXeiftb7C00009a0d at hotmail_com> <000a01c0eb99$54837980$85b2b4d1@jeads> <001301c0ebbd$a0b16320$591abcd0@kennussbaum>

> > well doesn't that just sum up what's wrong with moview reviewers.
> >
> > maybe that's why no one gives a crap what they say...
> >
> >             jay
>
>
> this is one of the rudest things i have ever seen on this list.  whether
or
> not you agree with melanie, her explanation was informative and polite.  I
> mean, wow . . . i was not at all involved in this discussion, but i just
> can't believe you said that, jay.

All these years Kyle & I have been on the list, and THAT is the rudest
thing?

Jesus H. Christ.

Fuck you AND the horse you subscribed on.

~C

---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

Follow-Ups:

Re: moulin rouge

From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>

References:

Re: moulin rouge

From: "Melanie Shannon" <arwen725 at hotmail_com>

Re: moulin rouge

From: "jay and jenna eads" <eadsj at qwest_net>

Re: moulin rouge

From: eustace clarence <ecscrubb at swbell_net>

Prev by Date: Re: moulin rouge
Next by Date: Re: moulin rouge
Prev by thread: Re: moulin rouge
Next by thread: Re: moulin rouge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread