[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Films For Radio Track List/Mini-Review

To: Melanie Shannon <arwen725 at hotmail_com>, Johncatt at aol_com, Over-the-Rhine at actwin_com
Subject: Re: Films For Radio Track List/Mini-Review
From: Kelvin Bailey <prestokelvo at yahoo_com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 08:33:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F93RPZBDUsJb7DpKGqJ0000a6b0 at hotmail_com>

--- Melanie Shannon <arwen725 at hotmail_com> wrote:
> 
> pardon me, but is 'more commercial and
> radio-friendly' a good thing??  this 
> frightens me...
> 

I don't think it's necessarily bad.  If "commercial
and radio-friendly" means created in an effort to
pander to the lowest common denominator, that's not
cool.  But if it just means that you discover your
songs are accesible to a wide audience, that's cool. 
Obscure and difficult aren't always synonomous with
quality.

(I promise I'll learn to spell "necessarily" and
"accessible".)

Kelvin

=====
"The pleasure of obedience is pretty thin compared to the pleasure of hearing a rotten tomato hit someone in the rear end."     --  Garrison Keillor

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
---------------
Unsubscribe by going to http://www.actwin.com/MediaNation/OtR/

References:

Re: Films For Radio Track List/Mini-Review

From: "Melanie Shannon" <arwen725 at hotmail_com>

Prev by Date: Re: Dan's race relations
Next by Date: Re: [none]
Prev by thread: Re: Films For Radio Track List/Mini-Review
Next by thread: Re: Films For Radio Track List/Mini-Review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread