<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are bloggers taken seriously?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/</link>
	<description>Relentless Self-Promotion -- Done RIGHT!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:54:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67835</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67835</guid>
		<description>Drew-- Firefox extensions are one of my favorite things.  I don&#039;t know how I lived without them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew&#8211; Firefox extensions are one of my favorite things.  I don&#8217;t know how I lived without them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67829</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67829</guid>
		<description>@Julie: True... I guess Google Reader is your best option! Google Reader, especially with a few Firefox extensions, is a damned fine reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Julie: True&#8230; I guess Google Reader is your best option! Google Reader, especially with a few Firefox extensions, is a damned fine reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67827</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67827</guid>
		<description>Drew-- just not portable on a mac.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew&#8211; just not portable on a mac.  <img src='http://www.drewvogel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67826</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67826</guid>
		<description>@Julie: No argument that Google Reader is a great solution, but FeedDemon&#039;s feeds ARE portable... I read synchronized feeds on three different computers (well, FOUR if you count my PDA, which also synchronizes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Julie: No argument that Google Reader is a great solution, but FeedDemon&#8217;s feeds ARE portable&#8230; I read synchronized feeds on three different computers (well, FOUR if you count my PDA, which also synchronizes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: posty mcposterton</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67825</link>
		<dc:creator>posty mcposterton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67825</guid>
		<description>Bloggers are fools.

~Dan
http://jazzsick.wordpress.com/ ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloggers are fools.</p>
<p>~Dan<br />
<a href="http://jazzsick.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jazzsick.wordpress.com/</a> <img src='http://www.drewvogel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67824</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67824</guid>
		<description>Interesting debate. I agree with you- it&#039;s about concent- not gender. The NY Times ran an interesting article yesterday about the BlogHer conference. They released new stats on the blogosphere- gender percentages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting debate. I agree with you- it&#8217;s about concent- not gender. The NY Times ran an interesting article yesterday about the BlogHer conference. They released new stats on the blogosphere- gender percentages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67823</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67823</guid>
		<description>And now I remember why I don&#039;t use FeedDemon-- I&#039;m on a mac and i prefer my feeds to be portable. Thus Google Reader is my perfect solution. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now I remember why I don&#8217;t use FeedDemon&#8211; I&#8217;m on a mac and i prefer my feeds to be portable. Thus Google Reader is my perfect solution. <img src='http://www.drewvogel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.drewvogel.com/2008/07/28/are-bloggers-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-67822</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewvogel.com/?p=1799#comment-67822</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response!  I totally agree that content should be king-- er, queen-- but, unfortunately, I don&#039;t think everyone is as progressive as you are. :) That content may be fantastic, but for some people-- still-- if it comes from a woman, it&#039;s not always looked on with as much seriousness as if it came from a man.  When was the last time you got a comment criticizing your outfit or appearance and not your content?  Look at the &#039;08 Democratic primary: some people wouldn&#039;t vote for Hillary Clinton for president, even though she was arguably more qualified than Obama for the sole reason that she was a woman.  Journalists-- non bloggers and bloggers alike-- commented on her &quot;emotionality&quot; and her clothing-- but you&#039;d never hear that about the male candidates. Then again, some people won&#039;t vote for Obama because he&#039;s black.  

As far as bloggers being taken as seriously as journalists? I think that the wheat will always separate from the chaff, and the good bloggers will (hopefully) stay around and get better and the ones that aren&#039;t won&#039;t.  Newspapers are losing circulation and people don&#039;t trust the media like they used to-- gone are the days of the anchors-as-father-figures-- and slowly, well-researched, blog-based journalism is gaining a lot of headway.  I think it&#039;ll be interesting who gets the scoop in the election-- traditional journalists or bloggers.  

Certainly, the blogosphere (man, do I hate that word) is in its infancy, and I doubt it will ever entirely replace newspapers and books (I refuse to read ebooks, personally), but I think that there&#039;s room for both the serious blog journalist AND the person who wants to write about their puppies and weekends.  That&#039;s the beauty of the web-- there&#039;s always been a place for everyone (and man, we do mean everyone...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response!  I totally agree that content should be king&#8211; er, queen&#8211; but, unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think everyone is as progressive as you are. <img src='http://www.drewvogel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  That content may be fantastic, but for some people&#8211; still&#8211; if it comes from a woman, it&#8217;s not always looked on with as much seriousness as if it came from a man.  When was the last time you got a comment criticizing your outfit or appearance and not your content?  Look at the &#8216;08 Democratic primary: some people wouldn&#8217;t vote for Hillary Clinton for president, even though she was arguably more qualified than Obama for the sole reason that she was a woman.  Journalists&#8211; non bloggers and bloggers alike&#8211; commented on her &#8220;emotionality&#8221; and her clothing&#8211; but you&#8217;d never hear that about the male candidates. Then again, some people won&#8217;t vote for Obama because he&#8217;s black.  </p>
<p>As far as bloggers being taken as seriously as journalists? I think that the wheat will always separate from the chaff, and the good bloggers will (hopefully) stay around and get better and the ones that aren&#8217;t won&#8217;t.  Newspapers are losing circulation and people don&#8217;t trust the media like they used to&#8211; gone are the days of the anchors-as-father-figures&#8211; and slowly, well-researched, blog-based journalism is gaining a lot of headway.  I think it&#8217;ll be interesting who gets the scoop in the election&#8211; traditional journalists or bloggers.  </p>
<p>Certainly, the blogosphere (man, do I hate that word) is in its infancy, and I doubt it will ever entirely replace newspapers and books (I refuse to read ebooks, personally), but I think that there&#8217;s room for both the serious blog journalist AND the person who wants to write about their puppies and weekends.  That&#8217;s the beauty of the web&#8211; there&#8217;s always been a place for everyone (and man, we do mean everyone&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
